What should a DSP do if they suspect a lack of informed consent?

A Direct Support Professional (DSP) has a critical role in ensuring that individuals receive services in a manner that respects their rights and autonomy. If a DSP suspects a lack of informed consent, it is essential to document this suspicion thoroughly. This documentation serves multiple purposes: it creates a record of the concern, ensures that the issue is addressed appropriately, and helps maintain transparency in the care process.

Addressing the suspicion is crucial because it upholds the ethical and legal standards of care. Individuals have the right to make informed decisions regarding their services, and the DSP must be diligent in ensuring these rights are recognized. Taking appropriate action after documenting the concern can include discussing it with a supervisor, the individual’s care team, or the individual themselves, depending on the situation. This approach not only promotes the individual’s autonomy and safety but also aligns with best practices for reporting and addressing potential issues concerning informed consent.

Other responses, such as proceeding with services regardless of the consent situation or ignoring the concerns, disregard the importance of informed consent and the individual's rights. Simply informing a supervisor without taking further appropriate actions does not fully address the seriousness of the situation. The correct choice demonstrates the necessity for vigilance and advocacy in the role of a DSP to ensure that individuals are empowered and informed